Powered by https://masum.info.bd/free-website-analyzer ()
health report : https://www.texasnurselawyers.com
examined at : 24-10-23 06:46:16
follow recommendations of this health report to keep your site healthy
Powered by https://masum.info.bd/free-website-analyzer ()
examined at : 24-10-23 06:46:16
follow recommendations of this health report to keep your site healthy
Texas Nurse Lawyer & Nurse License Defense Attorney
Your page title does not exceed 60 characters. It's fine.
Yong J. An, Texas Nurse Lawyer, has represented over 600 nurses before the Texas Board of Nursing since 2006, with a statewide legal practice focused on defending and fighting for nurses in the State of Texas.
Your meta description exceeds 150 characters. It's not good.
Your site do not have any meta keyword.
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nurse | 265 | 10.392 % | No |
| Attorney | 263 | 10.314 % | No |
| County | 117 | 4.588 % | No |
| Yong | 27 | 1.059 % | No |
| Texas | 24 | 0.941 % | No |
| case | 17 | 0.667 % | No |
| nursing | 13 | 0.51 % | No |
| lawyer | 13 | 0.51 % | No |
| Nursing | 11 | 0.431 % | No |
| Board | 11 | 0.431 % | No |
| Defense | 10 | 0.392 % | No |
| legal | 9 | 0.353 % | Yes |
| San | 8 | 0.314 % | No |
| license | 8 | 0.314 % | No |
| BON | 7 | 0.275 % | No |
| great | 7 | 0.275 % | No |
| made | 6 | 0.235 % | No |
| City | 5 | 0.196 % | No |
| attorney | 5 | 0.196 % | No |
| nurses | 5 | 0.196 % | No |
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nurse Attorney | 246 | 9.647 % | No |
| County Nurse | 117 | 4.588 % | No |
| my case | 12 | 0.471 % | No |
| Nurse Defense | 9 | 0.353 % | No |
| Defense Attorney | 8 | 0.314 % | No |
| that he | 8 | 0.314 % | No |
| Attorney San | 7 | 0.275 % | No |
| Yong J | 7 | 0.275 % | No |
| J An | 7 | 0.275 % | No |
| before the | 6 | 0.235 % | No |
| the Texas | 6 | 0.235 % | No |
| Board of | 6 | 0.235 % | No |
| of Nursing | 6 | 0.235 % | No |
| in Texas | 6 | 0.235 % | No |
| Attorney Yong | 6 | 0.235 % | No |
| I was | 6 | 0.235 % | No |
| City Nurse | 5 | 0.196 % | No |
| Texas Nurse | 5 | 0.196 % | No |
| Texas Board | 5 | 0.196 % | No |
| for my | 5 | 0.196 % | No |
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| County Nurse Attorney | 112 | 4.392 % | No |
| Nurse Defense Attorney | 8 | 0.314 % | No |
| Yong J An | 7 | 0.275 % | No |
| Nurse Attorney San | 6 | 0.235 % | No |
| Board of Nursing | 6 | 0.235 % | No |
| County Nurse Defense | 5 | 0.196 % | No |
| City Nurse Attorney | 5 | 0.196 % | No |
| Texas Board of | 5 | 0.196 % | No |
| the Texas Board | 4 | 0.157 % | No |
| I have to | 4 | 0.157 % | No |
| have to say | 4 | 0.157 % | No |
| to say that | 4 | 0.157 % | No |
| Park Nurse Attorney | 3 | 0.118 % | No |
| Nurse Attorney Fort | 3 | 0.118 % | No |
| I was able | 3 | 0.118 % | No |
| was able to | 3 | 0.118 % | No |
| Because of this | 3 | 0.118 % | No |
| an amazing lawyer | 3 | 0.118 % | No |
| handled my case | 3 | 0.118 % | No |
| my case He | 3 | 0.118 % | No |
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| County Nurse Defense Attorney | 5 | 0.196 % | No |
| Texas Board of Nursing | 5 | 0.196 % | No |
| the Texas Board of | 4 | 0.157 % | No |
| I have to say | 4 | 0.157 % | No |
| have to say that | 4 | 0.157 % | No |
| I was able to | 3 | 0.118 % | No |
| County Nurse Attorney El | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
| Nurse Attorney El Paso | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
| Attorney Harris County Nurse | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
| County Nurse Attorney Houston | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
| Attorney Round Rock Nurse | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
| Round Rock Nurse Attorney | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
| County Nurse Attorney Wichita | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
| Nurse Practitioners 2021 Annual | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
| Practitioners 2021 Annual CE | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
| 2021 Annual CE Conference | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
| before the Texas Board | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
| Yong J An has | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
| a Texas nurse lawyer | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
| Texas nurse lawyer today | 2 | 0.078 % | No |
The most using keywords do not match with meta keywords.
Your site have sitemap
https://www.texasnurselawyers.com/sitemap_index.xml
2550
Text/HTML Ratio Test : 9%
Your site have robot.txt
NoIndex : noindex directive is a meta tag value. noindex directive is for not to show your website on search engine results. You must not set ‘noindex’ as value in meta tags if you want to be your website on search engine result.
By default, a webpage is set to “index.” You should add a <meta name="robots" content="noindex" /> directive to a webpage in the <head> section of the HTML if you do not want search engines to crawl a given page and include it in the SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages).
DoFollow & NoFollow : nofollow directive is a meta tag value. Nofollow directive is for not to follow any links of your website by search engine bots. You must not set ‘nofollow’ as value in meta tags if you want follow your link by search engine bots.
By default, links are set to “follow.” You would set a link to “nofollow” in this way: <a href="http://www.example.com/" rel="nofollow">Anchor Text</a> if you want to suggest to Google that the hyperlink should not pass any link equity/SEO value to the link target.
Some links of your site are not SEO friendly.
Site failed plain text email test.5plain text email found.
Page have doc type.
Your site have 11 images without alt text.
Your site does not have any depreciated HTML tag.
HTML page size is > 100KB
GZIP compression is disabled.
Your site have 7 inline css.
Your site have 7 internal css.
Site failed micro data schema test.
| SL | Host | Class | TTL | Type | PRI | Target | IP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | texasnurselawyers.com | IN | 10798 | A | 192.124.249.52 | ||
| 2 | texasnurselawyers.com | IN | 3600 | NS | ns06.domaincontrol.com | ||
| 3 | texasnurselawyers.com | IN | 3600 | NS | ns05.domaincontrol.com | ||
| 4 | www.texasnurselawyers.com | IN | 10798 | CNAME | texasnurselawyers.com | ||
| 5 | texasnurselawyers.com | IN | 3600 | MX | 0 | mail.texasnurselawyers.com |
Site failed IP canonicalization test.
Site passed URL canonicalization test.
<link rel="canonical" href="https://mywebsite.com/home" /><link rel="canonical" href="https://www.mywebsite.com/home" />
Aggregates all network requests and groups them by typeLearn More
Potential savings of 1,900 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. Learn More
Potential savings of 28 KiB
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. Learn More
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. Learn More
8 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn More
Third-party code blocked the main thread for 3,780 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn More
2,680 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
6.9 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
Potential savings of 310 KiB
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. Learn More
10 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance. Learn More
Potential savings of 359 KiB
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. Learn More
Potential savings of 39 KiB
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. Learn More
Total size was 3,022 KiB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn More
11.4 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
32 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Learn More
1,433 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer Learn More
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn More
Potential savings of 31 KiB
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn More
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences. Learn More
10 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance. Learn More
Aggregates all network requests and groups them by typeLearn More
Potential savings of 480 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. Learn More
Potential savings of 28 KiB
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. Learn More
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. Learn More
8 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn More
Third-party code blocked the main thread for 110 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn More
170 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
1.3 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. Learn More
20 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance. Learn More
Potential savings of 563 KiB
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. Learn More
Potential savings of 39 KiB
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. Learn More
Total size was 3,124 KiB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn More
2.5 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
32 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Learn More
1,433 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer Learn More
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn More
Potential savings of 31 KiB
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn More
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences. Learn More
10 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance. Learn More